SEP Portfolio Evaluation
Which patents deserve deeper technical and essentiality analysis?
Prioritize selected patents using structured claim-to-standard analysis.
SEP claim chart services
AI-powered patent-to-standard mapping with expert technical review.
Map patent claims to relevant technical specifications with structured, limitation-by-limitation analysis, traceable evidence and expert review. Hashi IP Solutions helps organizations analyze selected patents or scale claim-to-specification workflows across larger portfolios.
Patent-to-standard mapping pipeline
Claim → Limitation → Evidence → Expert-reviewed claim chart
An SEP claim chart is a structured technical analysis that maps relevant patent claim limitations against potentially relevant portions of a technical standard or specification, supported by technical evidence and analytical rationale based on the agreed project scope.
Hashi IP Solutions provides SEP claim charting as a technical analysis service for organizations evaluating patents in standards-driven technologies.
Claim charts are typically commissioned when an important business, licensing or portfolio decision requires claim-level technical evidence.
Which patents deserve deeper technical and essentiality analysis?
Prioritize selected patents using structured claim-to-standard analysis.
What technical evidence supports the relationship between the patent and the standard?
Organize claim-level mapping for internal technical and licensing analysis.
What is behind the patent count?
Evaluate selected assets using claim-level technical evidence.
What technologies and standards are competitors potentially targeting?
Analyze claim-level technical positioning and specification relationships.
Which assets should be prioritized for deeper commercial evaluation?
Use structured technical mapping to support portfolio prioritization.
How do you scale claim analysis across hundreds or thousands of patents?
Combine AI-assisted candidate mapping with expert review workflows.
A keyword match is not claim-level evidence.
A commercially useful SEP claim chart requires more than identifying similar terminology. Each relevant claim limitation must be analyzed in the context of the technical concepts and supporting specification evidence.
Methodology
Licensing, portfolio evaluation, competitor analysis, due diligence or other defined business objectives.
Identify relevant claims and break complex claims into meaningful technical limitations.
Analyze the technical concepts represented by individual claim limitations.
Identify potentially relevant technical specifications, sections, clauses and supporting technical evidence.
Perform structured, limitation-by-limitation mapping against relevant evidence.
Review technical mappings and organize the results into a structured, traceable claim chart.
AI accelerates discovery.
Expert review validates the analysis.
Large SEP portfolios create a scale problem. Reviewing claims, identifying relevant technical concepts and locating potentially relevant specification evidence can require significant analytical effort.
AI-assisted workflows help identify and prioritize candidate mappings. Technical experts review the evidence, context and analytical basis of the final deliverable.
AI-assisted workflows can help accelerate
Workflow
AI-assisted. Expert-reviewed. Evidence-driven.
Structure shown is an anonymized illustration of claim chart fields.
Deliverables are customized based on the agreed project scope, technical domain and intended use of the analysis.
May analyze claims against:
Focuses on:
SEP claim charting specifically addresses the relationship between patent claims and standards-related technical requirements within the defined project scope.
Technology scope
2G / 3G / 4G / 5G / 5G-Advanced / emerging 6G technologies.
Technical specifications, releases and relevant technical documentation.
Relevant IEEE and wireless standards.
Open RAN architecture and interface technologies.
C-V2X and related connected mobility technologies.
Relevant interface, memory, chiplet and computing standards.
Project scope can be defined based on the relevant patent set, technology area and technical documentation.
A meaningful mapping depends on understanding both the language of the patent claim and the technical context of the relevant specification. Where applicable, analysis may consider:
Sources considered vary depending on project scope and available technical documentation.
Prioritize patents for deeper technical analysis.
Organize claim-level technical evidence.
Support portfolio evaluation and strategic decision-making.
Identify assets for further technical and commercial review.
Access specialist technical analysis support.
Evaluate selected patent assets beyond portfolio-level metrics.
Understand the technical relationship between selected claims and relevant standards.
Prioritize assets for deeper technical evaluation.
Look beyond patent counts and examine selected assets at claim level.
Evaluate technical positioning across selected patents and standards.
Request SEP claim charting
Tell us what you need to analyze. Our team can help scope the appropriate claim charting and patent-to-standard analysis workflow.
info@hashiip.comShare the patent, technology area and objective. We can help define the appropriate SEP claim charting workflow.
FAQ
An SEP claim chart is a structured analysis that maps relevant patent claim limitations against potentially relevant portions of a technical standard or specification, supported by technical evidence and analysis based on the project scope.
A patent claim chart may compare claims against products, processes, technical documents or other evidence. An SEP claim chart focuses specifically on analyzing the relationship between patent claims and relevant technical standards or specifications.
AI can assist with claim decomposition, technical concept analysis, candidate evidence retrieval and preliminary claim-to-specification alignment. Expert review remains important for evaluating technical context and the analytical basis of the mapping.
Hashi IP Solutions can scope standards-related patent analysis based on the relevant patent set, technology area, technical documentation and project objective.
For larger portfolios, AI-assisted workflows can support claim decomposition, candidate mapping and prioritization. The appropriate workflow depends on the portfolio size, technology domain and intended analysis.
Submit your patent or portfolio details, relevant technology or standard and project objective through the request form. The project can then be scoped based on the required analysis and deliverables.
The required information depends on the project scope. Typically, the analysis can be scoped using the relevant patent or patent family, technology area, applicable standard or technical documentation and the intended business objective.
Yes. Multiple-patent projects can be scoped for structured claim-to-specification analysis, with the workflow adapted to portfolio size, technology domain, technical documentation and intended use.
A technical claim chart can document the relationship between claim limitations and potentially relevant standard requirements within the defined scope. It should not be presented as an independent legal determination of essentiality.
Projects can be scoped for standards-driven technologies such as telecommunications, 3GPP cellular technologies, Wi-Fi/IEEE, O-RAN, automotive connectivity and relevant semiconductor technologies, depending on the patent set and technical documentation.
Explore further
Portfolio-scale SEP intelligence, declared SEP analytics and standards benchmarking.
Standards intelligence, product mapping and technical evidence workflows.
Landscapes, white-space analysis and portfolio audits.
Semantic prior art discovery, landscapes and competitive analysis.
3GPP, ETSI, ITU and IEEE 802 wireless IP expertise.
Talk to the Hashi IP Solutions technical analysis team.